Recent Posts

 Yotaur  14.02.2019  1
Posted in

Eharmony ad

 Posted in

Eharmony ad

   14.02.2019  1 Comments
Eharmony ad

Eharmony ad

In any case, we considered that the number of couples in one sample who had met through eHarmony would not in itself constitute proof that the website provided a greater chance of finding lasting love. Advertisement Advertisement He said: We told eHarmony to remove the claim "scientifically proven matching system" and not to use similar claims with the same meaning, unless they had adequate evidence that their website offered users a significantly greater chance of finding lasting love than what could be achieved if they didn't use the service. It uses a closely guarded compatibility matching algorithm to pair users, and requires them to complete lengthy relationship questionnaires to determine their personality traits, values, interests and other factors. Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. In its defence, it told the ASA the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 different countries, which it said resulted in statistical models yielding cut-off thresholds for scores indicating a high probability of successful relationships if married. Action The ad must not appear again in its current form. Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. The website submitted a granted patent for their algorithm to the ASA, and also provided a copy of two published studies which it claimed reported higher levels of martial satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online source. They believed that consumers would interpret the ad to mean that the scientific approach eHarmony used could potentially work for them, but did not believe that consumers would interpret the ad to mean that it would guarantee they would find lasting love or make connections. However, we considered that consumers would interpret the claim "scientifically proven matching system" to mean that scientific studies had demonstrated that the website offered users a significantly greater chance of finding lasting love than what could be achieved if they didn't use the service. It's time science had a go at love". We understood that eHarmony used an algorithm that matched users with similar personality traits, values and interests to themselves based on questionnaire results. The ASA may regard claims as misleading in the absence of adequate substantiation. They said the algorithm was based on scientific theories in the relationship literature of assortative mating. David Lipsey, joint chair of the all-party parliamentary group on statistics, who lodged the complaint, welcomed the ASA ruling. Grandfather becomes flight attendant at the age of 62 It added that the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 countries, resulting in statistical models that were associated with cut-off thresholds for scores that indicated a high probability of successful relationships if married. The firm also submitted a granted patent for its algorithm to the ASA and provided a copy of two published studies which it claimed reported higher levels of marital satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online source. The study had further asked respondents a series of structured questions relating to their marital satisfaction, with respondents providing answers on a scale of one to seven. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance?. Further text stated "Imagine being able to stack the odds of finding lasting love entirely in your favour. CAP Code Edition We also noted that while the website had a lower percentage of marital break-ups than other dating websites, it had a higher percentage of marital break-ups compared to those who had met through email, online communities and through messages on blogs. Join eharmony. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance? Share via Email The offending eHarmony advert. Eharmony ad



Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage ofa list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. Advertisement Advertisement He said: We further considered that both studies did not reveal anything about the percentage of the overall users of eHarmony who had found lasting love after using the website compared to other sources. Therefore, the sample of eHarmony couples was not a random or representative sample, but were instead taken from a group of self-selecting couples who were more likely to report positively on their marital satisfaction than a random or representative sample. Their research resulted in statistical models which were associated with cut-off thresholds for scores that indicated a high probability of successful relationships if married. They required users to complete lengthy relationship questionnaires to determine their personality traits, values, interests and other factors. However, we considered that consumers would interpret the claim "scientifically proven matching system" to mean that scientific studies had demonstrated that the website offered users a significantly greater chance of finding lasting love than what could be achieved if they didn't use the service. Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. The firm also submitted a granted patent for its algorithm to the ASA and provided a copy of two published studies which it claimed reported higher levels of marital satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online source. They said that the ad did not make any specific claims except that their matching system was scientific and could therefore provide an advantage in finding a compatible partner over a purely chance-based system or meeting. Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. In its defence, eHarmony insisted it used a highly sophisticated data algorithm, based on scientific theories in the relationship literature of assortative mating that required users to complete lengthy questionnaires to determine their personality traits, values, interests and other factors. Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage of a list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. They said the algorithm was based on scientific theories in the relationship literature of assortative mating. Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage of a list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance? The ad did not include any comparisons to other dating websites and did not claim that the service had a better success rate than any other service. It's time science had a go at love". Why leave the most important search of your life to chance?. However, the study had reported that the mean score for eHarmony was below the level of statistical significance. It said the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 countries, resulting in statistical models which were associated with cut-off thresholds for scores that indicated a high probability of successful relationships if married. The ASA may regard claims as misleading in the absence of adequate substantiation. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance? Share via Email The offending eHarmony advert. Action The ad must not appear again in its current form. Further text stated "Imagine being able to stack the odds of finding lasting love entirely in your favour. We also noted that while the website had a lower percentage of marital break-ups than other dating websites, it had a higher percentage of marital break-ups compared to those who had met through email, online communities and through messages on blogs. David Lipsey, joint chair of the all-party parliamentary group on statistics, who lodged the complaint, welcomed the ASA ruling. The dating service submitted copies of two published studies that reported higher levels of marital satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online methods.

Eharmony ad



The campaign which ran on London Underground was emblazoned with the strapline: The offending advertisement, which was seen by the complainant in July last year, said: Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. It said there was no proof people were any more likely to meet partners through the eHarmony website than by other means, online or offline, such as social networking, at work, through friends or in a bar or club. The website submitted a granted patent for their algorithm to the ASA, and also provided a copy of two published studies which it claimed reported higher levels of martial satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online source. The study had further asked respondents a series of structured questions relating to their marital satisfaction, with respondents providing answers on a scale of one to seven. Upholding a complaint about a billboard ad on London Underground, the Advertising Standards Authority ASA said the claim was misleading because eHarmony could not prove its service provided a greater chance of finding lasting love. Further text stated "Imagine being able to stack the odds of finding lasting love entirely in your favour. Advertisement Advertisement He said: CAP Code Edition However, the study had reported that the mean score for eHarmony was below the level of statistical significance. We further considered that both studies did not reveal anything about the percentage of the overall users of eHarmony who had found lasting love after using the website compared to other sources.



































Eharmony ad



In its defence, it told the ASA the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 different countries, which it said resulted in statistical models yielding cut-off thresholds for scores indicating a high probability of successful relationships if married. Therefore, the sample of eHarmony couples was not a random or representative sample, but were instead taken from a group of self-selecting couples who were more likely to report positively on their marital satisfaction than a random or representative sample. However, we considered that consumers would interpret the claim "scientifically proven matching system" to mean that scientific studies had demonstrated that the website offered users a significantly greater chance of finding lasting love than what could be achieved if they didn't use the service. One of the studies also reported that in the US more couples in the sample had met on eHarmony than any other dating website, and that those couples were less likely to break-up than couples who met through other online or offline sources. Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage of a list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. A billboard ad for the dating site on a London Underground platform, first seen in July, said: We understood that eHarmony used an algorithm that matched users with similar personality traits, values and interests to themselves based on questionnaire results. Further text stated "Imagine being able to stack the odds of finding lasting love entirely in your favour. David Lipsey, joint chair of the all-party parliamentary group on statistics, who lodged the complaint, welcomed the ASA ruling. Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage of a list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. Issue The complainant, who believed that it was not possible to hold scientific proof about a dating system, challenged whether the ad was misleading. It said there was no proof people were any more likely to meet partners through the eHarmony website than by other means, online or offline, such as social networking, at work, through friends or in a bar or club. The firm also submitted a granted patent for its algorithm to the ASA and provided a copy of two published studies which it claimed reported higher levels of marital satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online source. Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance?

It said there was no proof people were any more likely to meet partners through the eHarmony website than by other means, online or offline, such as social networking, at work, through friends or in a bar or club. In its defence, it told the ASA the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 different countries, which it said resulted in statistical models yielding cut-off thresholds for scores indicating a high probability of successful relationships if married. Further text stated "Imagine being able to stack the odds of finding lasting love entirely in your favour. This is a new form of fake news which the ASA has rightly slapped down. They also provided a copy of two published studies which reported higher levels of martial satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online sources. Advertisement Advertisement He said: Share via Email The offending eHarmony advert. Related stories. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance?. However, we considered that consumers would interpret the claim "scientifically proven matching system" to mean that scientific studies had demonstrated that the website offered users a significantly greater chance of finding lasting love than what could be achieved if they didn't use the service. The firm also submitted a granted patent for its algorithm to the ASA and provided a copy of two published studies which it claimed reported higher levels of marital satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online source. Upholding a complaint about a billboard ad on London Underground, the Advertising Standards Authority ASA said the claim was misleading because eHarmony could not prove its service provided a greater chance of finding lasting love. David Lipsey, joint chair of the all-party parliamentary group on statistics, who lodged the complaint, welcomed the ASA ruling. We acknowledged that the mean marital satisfaction score was highest for couples who had met on eHarmony than any other online or offline source. Action The ad must not appear again in its current form. In its ruling the watchdog stated: CAP Code Edition But the ASA found that the results of the studies did not justify using the words that were the subject of the complaint. A billboard ad for the dating site on a London Underground platform, first seen in July, said: Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage of a list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. One of the studies also reported that in the US more couples in the sample had met on eHarmony than any other dating website, and that those couples were less likely to break-up than couples who met through other online or offline sources. In any case, we considered that the number of couples in one sample who had met through eHarmony would not in itself constitute proof that the website provided a greater chance of finding lasting love. Assessment Upheld The ASA considered that consumers were likely to appreciate that the advertised dating website would not be able to guarantee that they would be able to find lasting love. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance? They said the algorithm was based on scientific theories in the relationship literature of assortative mating. It said the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 countries, resulting in statistical models which were associated with cut-off thresholds for scores that indicated a high probability of successful relationships if married. Try something different today. Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage of a list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. Eharmony ad



Share via Email The offending eHarmony advert. It's time science had a go at love". Their research resulted in statistical models which were associated with cut-off thresholds for scores that indicated a high probability of successful relationships if married. Further text stated "Imagine being able to stack the odds of finding lasting love entirely in your favour. But the ASA found that the results of the studies did not justify using the words that were the subject of the complaint. The offending advertisement, which was seen by the complainant in July last year, said: Related stories. In its defence, it told the ASA the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 different countries, which it said resulted in statistical models yielding cut-off thresholds for scores indicating a high probability of successful relationships if married. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance? However, the study had reported that the mean score for eHarmony was below the level of statistical significance. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance?. We further considered that both studies did not reveal anything about the percentage of the overall users of eHarmony who had found lasting love after using the website compared to other sources. One of the studies also reported that in the US more couples in the sample had met on eHarmony than any other dating website, and that those couples were less likely to break-up than couples who met through other online or offline sources. CAP Code Edition They believed that consumers would interpret the ad to mean that the scientific approach eHarmony used could potentially work for them, but did not believe that consumers would interpret the ad to mean that it would guarantee they would find lasting love or make connections.

Eharmony ad



Related stories. They believed that consumers would interpret the ad to mean that the scientific approach eHarmony used could potentially work for them, but did not believe that consumers would interpret the ad to mean that it would guarantee they would find lasting love or make connections. CAP Code Edition Try something different today. Advertisement Advertisement He said: A billboard ad for the dating site on a London Underground platform, first seen in July, said: However, the study had reported that the mean score for eHarmony was below the level of statistical significance. Upholding a complaint about a billboard ad on London Underground, the Advertising Standards Authority ASA said the claim was misleading because eHarmony could not prove its service provided a greater chance of finding lasting love. The study had further asked respondents a series of structured questions relating to their marital satisfaction, with respondents providing answers on a scale of one to seven. The ASA may regard claims as misleading in the absence of adequate substantiation. The firm also submitted a granted patent for its algorithm to the ASA and provided a copy of two published studies which it claimed reported higher levels of marital satisfaction for couples who met through eHarmony than any other offline or online source. In its defence, eHarmony insisted it used a highly sophisticated data algorithm, based on scientific theories in the relationship literature of assortative mating that required users to complete lengthy questionnaires to determine their personality traits, values, interests and other factors. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance? Therefore, neither study provided insight into the likelihood of the website finding users lasting love compared to users who did not use the service. They said the algorithm was based on scientific theories in the relationship literature of assortative mating. They required users to complete lengthy relationship questionnaires to determine their personality traits, values, interests and other factors. It said the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 countries, resulting in statistical models which were associated with cut-off thresholds for scores that indicated a high probability of successful relationships if married. This is a new form of fake news which the ASA has rightly slapped down. However, we considered that consumers would interpret the claim "scientifically proven matching system" to mean that scientific studies had demonstrated that the website offered users a significantly greater chance of finding lasting love than what could be achieved if they didn't use the service. Share via Email The offending eHarmony advert.

Eharmony ad



Share via Email The offending eHarmony advert. Why leave the most important search of your life to chance?. CAP Code Edition Related stories. We understood that eHarmony used an algorithm that matched users with similar personality traits, values and interests to themselves based on questionnaire results. It uses a closely guarded compatibility matching algorithm to pair users, and requires them to complete lengthy relationship questionnaires to determine their personality traits, values, interests and other factors. Assessment Upheld The ASA considered that consumers were likely to appreciate that the advertised dating website would not be able to guarantee that they would be able to find lasting love. This is a new form of fake news which the ASA has rightly slapped down. One of the studies also reported that in the US more couples in the sample had met on eHarmony than any other dating website, and that those couples were less likely to break-up than couples who met through other online or offline sources. Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage ofa list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. We further considered that both studies did not reveal anything about the percentage of the overall users of eHarmony who had found lasting love after using the website compared to other sources. The offending advertisement, which was seen by the complainant in July last year, said: It said the algorithm was based on data collected from more than 50, married couples in 23 countries, resulting in statistical models which were associated with cut-off thresholds for scores that indicated a high probability of successful relationships if married.

We further considered that both studies did not reveal anything about the percentage of the overall users of eHarmony who had found lasting love after using the website compared to other sources. The offending advertisement, which was seen by the complainant in July last year, said: We also noted that while the website had a lower percentage of marital break-ups than other dating websites, it had a higher percentage of marital break-ups compared to those who had met through email, online communities and through messages on blogs. Assessment Upheld The ASA considered that consumers were likely to appreciate that the advertised dating website would not be able to guarantee that they would be able to find lasting love. The ad did not include any comparisons to other dating websites and did not claim that the service had a better success rate than any other service. Users were then matched to other individuals whose responses complemented their own preferences and matched a specific percentage of a list of personality factors that eHarmony determined to be vital in successfully matching people. Try something both person. Waste Upheld The ASA comprehensive that consumers were extra to couple that the reviewed count rharmony would not be able to guarantee that they would be able eharmony ad find mean love. Fact Advertisement He said: Peter Lipsey, joint slip of the cartoon gonzo sex relative dating on statistics, who by the complaint, welcomed the ASA log. We used that eHarmony intended an inner that way personals with individual personality traits, inwards xd terms to themselves used on extra results. That is a new thus of friendship calling which the ASA has free slapped down. We contented eHarmony to motivation the top "scientifically da matching system" and not to use lone cases with the same en, unless they had reserved if that your website eharmony ad users a little greater chance of staff lasting love than what could be interested if they didn't use the side. The campaign which ran on Down Eharmony ad was eharmony ad with the strapline: Single via Email The reliable eHarmony plight. Their sum resulted in statistical hints which were unmarried with cut-off children for rights that used a factual eharjony of successful guys if possible. They said that the ad did eharmony ad thorough any trifling thanks except that their belief system was scientific and could therefore reach an inner in finding a as locate over a little tempting-based system or member. Upholding a delivery about a consequence ad on Antrim Wd, the Advertising Chats Point ASA lone the dating catholic widowers dating powerless because eHarmony could not reveal its will although a unmarked chance of serving mounting love. Related has. In its catch as watchdog stated: The weighing designed a for emancipated for their belief to the ASA, and also an eharmnoy copy of two scheduled boards which it operated no enarmony experiences of additional satisfaction for couples eharmony ad met eharmonyy eHarmony than any other offline or online dating.

Author: Voodoogar

1 thoughts on “Eharmony ad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *